No. No. No.
No.
No.
Okay, so I’m about half of the way through Doc of the Dead on Netflix (it’s a
little too goofy for its own good, but it has some stunning visuals in its
interlude pieces and it includes fascinating interviews from some very heavy
hitters in the zombie community) and I’m getting really frustrated, so I’m
going to take a few minutes to just vent here.
Cool? Good.
Here’s my problem: Haitian zombies aren't zombies.
There, I said it. They just aren't.
Although
they share a name with the creature introduced and popularized by the works of
Romero (a slow moving, mindless, reanimated corpse that craves human flesh, that multiplies
by killing victims who then become zombies, and that can only be (re)killed by
a direct attack on its brain), the Haitian Vodou zombie should not be confused with zombies as we now
think of them (i.e. the zombies this blog is dedicated to). Despite a few obvious similarities, in most observable ways the
Haitian zombie and the Romero zombie are two separate constructs and, though
linked thematically, should be considered as distinct from one another. Of
course, I'm not implying that we should not refer to Haitian zombies as zombies
(it is THEIR name, after all), but rather that it is necessary to acknowledge
the fundamental differences between the two concepts in order to gain a full
understanding of either.
First, though, let's get
through the apparent similarities: Haitian zombies are people raised from the
dead*, and Haitian zombies are mindless**. That's pretty much where it ends.
And, in both cases, the seeming similarity is undermined in some sense (hence,
the asterisks).
![]() |
Zonbi, by Wilson Bigaud, 1939 |
Next, although, for people like
zombie connoisseur John Skipp the tragic truth about Haitian zombies is
that "they [are] slaves. Either raised from the dead to do some vile
master's bidding, or somehow mesmerized into mindless subservience, zombies
were the husked-out shells of humanity, whose sole purpose was to do the
degrading shit no willful soul would do. In that sense they were the ultimate
slaves, in that they had no will of their own," ** Haitian zombies are not
actually mindless (Skipp 10). Though the same could be said of the zombies
in Night of the Living
Dead - who try car door
handles, use basic tools, shield their eyes from branches, and demonstrate basic self-preservation skills in
avoiding fire - the Haitian zombie is un-mindless in a very different way.
Not only
are they capable of far more intricate tasks (reaping sugar cane is not an easy chore), but they are actually
able to follow orders. This indicates a level of receptive communication that
the Romero zombies simply lack. This is decidedly not a trivial distinction;
the Haitian zombie is defined by its tractability, the Romero zombie by their inability to be controlled. Where the Haitian zombies are literal
slaves, the Romero zombie is a slave only to its appetite. These are very clear
indications of the stark differences in cultural anxieties between the two
societies that created these very distinct monstrous figures. To grossly
oversimplify, one fears being controlled, one fears being out of control.
![]() |
Know what sucks? Doin' this. Photo: Sean Smith |
(I just realized that Haitian
zombies and Romero's both shamble very similarly in a way that is not readily
undermined in any demonstrable way. So there's that linking them, I guess. In
the immortal words of Deep Blue Something, "Well, that's the one thing
we've got").
To be continued...
No comments:
Post a Comment